Poker Profitability Outlook

A win rate is not a salary — it's the average of a hundred very different years. Enter yours, with your stakes and volume, and this tool simulates 200 of those years: the profit you should actually expect, the range around it, the downswings on the way, the losing months a winning player still posts, and the bankroll that survives all of it. Free, no signup.

Last updated July 5, 2026Monte Carlo · 200 yearsFree · no signup
Your next year, simulated 200×52 weeks →

This site also has a free practice mode — play hands against AI opponents. No signup. Try the practice table →

Embed this tool on your site or forum — free

Paste this into any blog post, forum thread, or coaching site. It stays free, always up to date, and needs no account. Please keep the attribution link.

<iframe src="https://holdempro.app/tools/outlook?embed=1" width="100%" height="620" style="border:0;border-radius:12px;background:#0a0a0b" title="Poker profitability outlook by HoldemPro" loading="lazy"></iframe>
<p style="font-size:12px;margin:4px 0 0">Powered by <a href="https://holdempro.app/tools/outlook">HoldemPro</a></p>

The honest year, at a glance

Simulated reference values (4,000 trials per row): 40,040 hands over a year at the standard 80bb/100 standard deviation. All figures in big blinds — divide by 100 for buy-ins.

Win rateMedian yearRealistic rangeLosing yearLosing monthWorst downswing (median)
-2 bb/100-786 bb-2,8591,24769%56%1,986 bb
0 bb/1000 bb-2,0862,06250%50%1,577 bb
+2 bb/100807 bb-1,2982,86531%44%1,305 bb
+5 bb/1001,988 bb-1594,00912%36%1,023 bb
+8 bb/1003,121 bb1,1865,2492%29%837 bb

What this table is really saying

Read the +2 row closely: a genuine winning player books a losing month 44% of the time and a losing year nearly one time in three. Variance is loud enough to drown a small edge for months — which cuts both ways: your bad stretch may prove nothing, and your winning streak may prove just as little. The one lever that moves every column at once is the win rate itself — and at low stakes the gap between −2 and +5 is usually 2–3 repeated, fixable mistakes. The free 2-minute leak quiz finds your most expensive one — no email, no signup.

Variance & profitability FAQ

How big a downswing is normal in poker?

Bigger than feels fair. In our simulations (40,000 hands/year, 80bb/100 std dev), even a solid 5bb/100 winner's median worst downswing of the year is about 1,000 big blinds — 10 full buy-ins — and one bad year in ten reaches 1,800bb. A breakeven player's median worst run is nearly 1,600bb. Downswings of this size are the cost of playing, not evidence something broke.

Can a winning player have a losing month?

Routinely. At 5bb/100 over roughly 3,000 hands a month, about 36% of months lose — one in three. At 2bb/100 it's 44%, nearly a coin flip. A losing month tells you almost nothing about your skill; a losing year starts to, but even the 5bb/100 winner posts one 12% of the time.

How many hands do you need to know your win rate?

More than almost anyone has. Your measured win rate over N hands has a standard error of about 80 ÷ √(N/100) bb/100 — so after 10,000 hands the error bar is ±8bb/100, and even 100,000 hands only narrows it to ±2.5. This is why 'I'm up over 5,000 hands' means very little, and why diagnosing specific leaks beats staring at a graph.

What win rate is realistic in low-stakes cash games?

Solid regs at micro and low stakes commonly sustain 3–8bb/100; exceptional players in soft games can run higher. The brutal math is on the other side: the average player is negative once rake is counted. The difference between −2 and +5 is rarely talent — it's a handful of repeated, fixable mistakes.

Is this the same as a bankroll calculator?

It contains one. The bankroll figure here uses the classic risk-of-ruin formula on your inputs, but the outlook shows the rest of the picture that number lives in: what the year that bankroll must survive actually looks like — the bands, the downswings, and the losing stretches a winning player still endures.